Set up a keyword alert for your category and you will get exactly what you asked for: every time those words appear. What you will not get is any sense of whether the person saying them wants to buy anything.
Three people write the word "invoicing" on Reddit in the same hour:
- one is asking which tool to switch to, having just been hit by a price rise;
- one is venting about a client who has not paid in ninety days and explicitly says they are not looking for advice;
- one is writing a retrospective about the invoicing script they built two years ago.
A keyword alert treats these identically. Only the first is a lead. The second is someone to leave alone. The third is a peer, not a prospect.
The judgement is the product
Distinguishing those three is not a filtering problem you can solve with better keywords, because the words are the same. It needs a read of what the person is actually doing: do they have the problem, are they looking for a solution, and are they the kind of buyer you serve?
That is why every Rederva lead is scored on relevance, problem fit, purchase intent, urgency and freshness rather than on match count — and why the breakdown is shown to you rather than hidden behind a single number.
Fewer results is the point
A well-scoped monitor surfaces a handful of genuinely high-intent conversations a week. If a tool is showing you hundreds, it is showing you mentions and calling them leads.
The measure that matters is not how many conversations you were shown. It is how many replies you were glad you posted.